James Paterson represents the Defendant in a causation case involving CCTV evidence of the accident; a finding of Fundamental Dishonesty was made
Troy v ERS
James Paterson represents Defendant in a causation case involving CCTV evidence of the accident, a finding of Fundamental Dishonesty was made in respect of the claim on the basis of the District Judge concluding that the Claimant gave inconsistent accounts he must have known were wrong or known were not genuinely true when he gave them.
Also Recently
-
Congratulations to Charlotte Russell on the successful completion of her Pupillage
We are delighted to congratulate Charlotte Russell on the successful completion of her Civil Pupillage.Today marks an exciting milestone as…
Sept 09
-
James Paterson secures a finding of fundamental dishonesty (‘FD’) in a claim in which the Claimant was found to have deliberately misled his medical experts
James Paterson secures a finding of fundamental dishonesty (‘FD’) in a claim in which the Claimant was found to have…
Sept 03










