James Paterson represents the Defendant in a causation case involving CCTV evidence of the accident; a finding of Fundamental Dishonesty was made
Troy v ERS
James Paterson represents Defendant in a causation case involving CCTV evidence of the accident, a finding of Fundamental Dishonesty was made in respect of the claim on the basis of the District Judge concluding that the Claimant gave inconsistent accounts he must have known were wrong or known were not genuinely true when he gave them.
Also Recently
-
Iain Simkin KC prosecutes a Husband and son jailed for 'shocking' neglect death.
Iain Simkin KC recently prosecuted a Husband and son jailed for 'shocking' neglect death.The husband and son of a severely…
Mar 26
-
Deans Court Chambers Mourns the Loss of Jonathan Grace
It is with great shock and sadness that Deans Court Chambers announces the death of our dear friend and colleague,…
Mar 25