James Paterson represents the Defendant in a causation case involving CCTV evidence of the accident; a finding of Fundamental Dishonesty was made
Troy v ERS
James Paterson represents Defendant in a causation case involving CCTV evidence of the accident, a finding of Fundamental Dishonesty was made in respect of the claim on the basis of the District Judge concluding that the Claimant gave inconsistent accounts he must have known were wrong or known were not genuinely true when he gave them.
Also Recently
-
Successful High Court defence for the Defendant in an e-bike collision claim arising from an accident at Trafalgar Square
The Claimant, riding an e-bike, was travelling around Trafalgar Square shortly before midnight, on his way home. His route took…
Oct 23
-
Vacancy - Personal Injury Practitioners
Deans Court Chambers is inviting applications from outstanding and ambitious Personal Injury practitioners to join our highly regarded team.Led by…
Oct 15










