James Paterson obtains finding of fundamental dishonesty
James Paterson obtains finding of fundamental dishonesty. Representing the Defendant in a claim for personal injury the Court dismissed the claim determining the same to be fundamentally dishonest. A finding was made that the Claimant had substantially affected the presentation of his case by representing that he had difficulties in, and indeed required assistance with, self-care during a period in which he was found on social media to be undertaking “strenuous and arduous” fell walking. District Judge Derbyshire determined that the Claimant’s case on injury was ‘entirely inconsistent’ and that ’the Claimant has lied’. The Claimant was ordered to pay the Defendant’s costs of the action on an indemnity basis pursuant to CPR44.16.
With thanks to Sian Owens-Atkins of Clyde & Co for their instruction

Also Recently
-
Oliver Carr secures recording of causative healthcare failures and a neglect conclusion in Article 2 jury inquest
Oliver Carr represented the Family of the Deceased, who was a serving prisoner at the time of his death. Healthcare…
Apr 20
-
Chambers shortlisted for 4 awards at the Advocate Pro Bono Awards 2026
Chambers is delighted to have see 4 nominations shortlisted at the Advocate Pro Bono Awards 2026.Sophie Cartwright KC - Shortlisted…
Apr 15








