Joe Hart defended an osteopath who practices for a number of months without the requisite insurance, having been misadvised by his broker
Joe Hart defended an osteopath who practices for a number of months without the requisite insurance, having been misadvised by his broker. The allegation was one of unprofessional conduct and the osteopath faced the possibility of significant sanctions. Ultimately the disciplinary committee found that the osteopath had not acted without integrity and went on to find that he was not guilty of unprofessional conduct.
Also Recently
-
Successful High Court defence for the Defendant in an e-bike collision claim arising from an accident at Trafalgar Square
The Claimant, riding an e-bike, was travelling around Trafalgar Square shortly before midnight, on his way home. His route took…
Oct 23
-
Vacancy - Personal Injury Practitioners
Deans Court Chambers is inviting applications from outstanding and ambitious Personal Injury practitioners to join our highly regarded team.Led by…
Oct 15
