Joe Hart defended an osteopath who practices for a number of months without the requisite insurance, having been misadvised by his broker
Joe Hart defended an osteopath who practices for a number of months without the requisite insurance, having been misadvised by his broker. The allegation was one of unprofessional conduct and the osteopath faced the possibility of significant sanctions. Ultimately the disciplinary committee found that the osteopath had not acted without integrity and went on to find that he was not guilty of unprofessional conduct.
Also Recently
-
Oliver Carr secures recording of causative healthcare failures and a neglect conclusion in Article 2 jury inquest
Oliver Carr represented the Family of the Deceased, who was a serving prisoner at the time of his death. Healthcare…
Apr 20
-
Chambers shortlisted for 4 awards at the Advocate Pro Bono Awards 2026
Chambers is delighted to have see 4 nominations shortlisted at the Advocate Pro Bono Awards 2026.Sophie Cartwright KC - Shortlisted…
Apr 15








