Joe Hart defended an osteopath who practices for a number of months without the requisite insurance, having been misadvised by his broker
Joe Hart defended an osteopath who practices for a number of months without the requisite insurance, having been misadvised by his broker. The allegation was one of unprofessional conduct and the osteopath faced the possibility of significant sanctions. Ultimately the disciplinary committee found that the osteopath had not acted without integrity and went on to find that he was not guilty of unprofessional conduct.
Also Recently
-
18/11/2025 - SYSTEM ISSUES
Unfortunately we are currently experiencing technical difficulties. Our servers and phone system are temporarily unavailable. We will endeavour to respond…
Nov 18
-
Peter Smith secures another acquittal in a s.37(1) prosecution,
Peter represented a former director and ‘Tool Maker’ of a company, concerning a serious injury sustained by a ‘Tool Setter’…
Nov 10
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>