Joe Hart defended an osteopath who practices for a number of months without the requisite insurance, having been misadvised by his broker
Joe Hart defended an osteopath who practices for a number of months without the requisite insurance, having been misadvised by his broker. The allegation was one of unprofessional conduct and the osteopath faced the possibility of significant sanctions. Ultimately the disciplinary committee found that the osteopath had not acted without integrity and went on to find that he was not guilty of unprofessional conduct.
Also Recently
-
Congratulations to Charlotte Russell on the successful completion of her Pupillage
We are delighted to congratulate Charlotte Russell on the successful completion of her Civil Pupillage.Today marks an exciting milestone as…
Sept 09
-
James Paterson secures a finding of fundamental dishonesty (‘FD’) in a claim in which the Claimant was found to have deliberately misled his medical experts
James Paterson secures a finding of fundamental dishonesty (‘FD’) in a claim in which the Claimant was found to have…
Sept 03
