Joe Hart defended an osteopath who practices for a number of months without the requisite insurance, having been misadvised by his broker
Joe Hart defended an osteopath who practices for a number of months without the requisite insurance, having been misadvised by his broker. The allegation was one of unprofessional conduct and the osteopath faced the possibility of significant sanctions. Ultimately the disciplinary committee found that the osteopath had not acted without integrity and went on to find that he was not guilty of unprofessional conduct.
Also Recently
-
Peter Smith secures another acquittal in a s.37(1) prosecution,
Peter represented a former director and ‘Tool Maker’ of a company, concerning a serious injury sustained by a ‘Tool Setter’…
Nov 10
-
Deans Court Chambers welcomes four new pupils
We are delighted to welcome four new pupils to chambers as they begin the next stage in their legal careers.…
Nov 10
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>