Joe Hart defended an osteopath who practices for a number of months without the requisite insurance, having been misadvised by his broker
Joe Hart defended an osteopath who practices for a number of months without the requisite insurance, having been misadvised by his broker. The allegation was one of unprofessional conduct and the osteopath faced the possibility of significant sanctions. Ultimately the disciplinary committee found that the osteopath had not acted without integrity and went on to find that he was not guilty of unprofessional conduct.
Also Recently
-
Fraser Livesey appears in an inquest dealing with a death during the Strep A outbreak
Fraser Livesey appears in an inquest dealing with a death during the Strep A outbreak, the Court joining the DepartmentâŠ
Jan 15
-
James Paterson obtains finding of fundamental dishonesty
James Paterson obtains finding of fundamental dishonesty. Representing the Defendant in a claim for personal injury the Court dismissed theâŠ
Jan 14