Joe Hart defended an osteopath who practices for a number of months without the requisite insurance, having been misadvised by his broker
Joe Hart defended an osteopath who practices for a number of months without the requisite insurance, having been misadvised by his broker. The allegation was one of unprofessional conduct and the osteopath faced the possibility of significant sanctions. Ultimately the disciplinary committee found that the osteopath had not acted without integrity and went on to find that he was not guilty of unprofessional conduct.
Also Recently
-
Thomas McKail successful in acquittal for client (BM) facing charges including possession of a prohibited firearm at Nottingham Crown Court following trial.
Thomas McKail successful in acquittal for client (BM) facing charges including possession of a prohibited firearm at Nottingham Crown Court…
Jun 18
-
Team DCC run the Manchester 10k 2026
Team Deans Court Chambers took to the streets of Manchester this weekend for the Manchester 10k, and what an incredible…
Jun 04










