James Paterson secures finding of fundamental dishonesty for Defendant insurer in a remote trial
James Paterson secures finding of fundamental dishonesty for Defendant insurer in a remote trial.
Representing the Defendant in a personal injury claim arising out of a minor road traffic accident. In a remote trial heard by CVP before HHJ Coe the claim was found to be fundamentally dishonest as the accident was not capable of causing injury and the Claimant had tried to attribute pre-existing symptoms to the accident ‘in hope of additional monies’.
Also Recently
-
Successful High Court defence for the Defendant in an e-bike collision claim arising from an accident at Trafalgar Square
The Claimant, riding an e-bike, was travelling around Trafalgar Square shortly before midnight, on his way home. His route took…
Oct 23
-
Vacancy - Personal Injury Practitioners
Deans Court Chambers is inviting applications from outstanding and ambitious Personal Injury practitioners to join our highly regarded team.Led by…
Oct 15
