James Paterson secures finding of fundamental dishonesty for Defendant insurer in a remote trial
James Paterson secures finding of fundamental dishonesty for Defendant insurer in a remote trial.
Representing the Defendant in a personal injury claim arising out of a minor road traffic accident. In a remote trial heard by CVP before HHJ Coe the claim was found to be fundamentally dishonest as the accident was not capable of causing injury and the Claimant had tried to attribute pre-existing symptoms to the accident ‘in hope of additional monies’.

Also Recently
-
Andrew Gurney represented Adam Carruthers, one of the defendants in the Sycamore Gap Tree felling case
Andrew Gurney of Deans Court Chambers represented Adam Carruthers, one of the defendants in the Sycamore Gap Tree felling case.Each…
May 09
-
Clerking Vacancy - Closing date 14th May
Civil / Family ClerkLocation: ManchesterSalary: Subject to experienceClosing Date: 14th May 2025Following promotions in our clerking team we are recruiting…
May 02