James Paterson represents Defendant in a finding of Fundamental Dishonesty made against the Claimant in an LVI case
Representing the Defendant, a finding of Fundamental Dishonesty was made against the Claimant in an LVI case in which it was found the Claimant had deliberately exaggerated the circumstances of a road traffic accident to pursue a dishonest personal injury claim. The Court found that the Claimant was not injured and that the severity of the contact between the two vehicles was such that he did not experience movement capable of causing injury. An enforceable costs order was made against the Claimant.
Also Recently
-
Successful High Court defence for the Defendant in an e-bike collision claim arising from an accident at Trafalgar Square
The Claimant, riding an e-bike, was travelling around Trafalgar Square shortly before midnight, on his way home. His route took…
Oct 23
-
Vacancy - Personal Injury Practitioners
Deans Court Chambers is inviting applications from outstanding and ambitious Personal Injury practitioners to join our highly regarded team.Led by…
Oct 15










