- All Barristers
- Nicola Carroll
Nicola is an established criminal practitioner with over 20 years experience working within the Criminal Justice System. She is an extremely capable advocate with excellent client care.
Prior to joining the Independent Bar Nicola spent 14 years as a Prosecutor at the Crown Prosecution Service in the North West where she litigated the most serious and complex cases including Murder, Death by Dangerous Driving, Rape and Serious Sexual Offences, high value Frauds, and lengthy and voluminous Drug conspiracies and operations.
Prior to joining the CPS in 2004 Nicola worked in a paralegal role on the Shipman Inquiry and the well publicised and now controversial MMR group litigation claims. Nicola has vast experience in handling sensitive and multifaceted data streams.
She is instructed by both the Prosecution and the Defence in a vast range of serious cases.
She is appointed as a Level 3 Prosecutor on the Crown Prosecution Service Advocate Panel and has been appointed to the CPS Rape and Serious Sexual Abuse List.
For a short time in 2014 Nicola worked for the Inspectorate of the CPS, HMCPSi, and was a contributor to the report “Achieving Best Evidence in Child Sexual Abuse Cases – a Joint Inspection.“
"Nicola is an excellent advocate in Court, who does not back down."
Instructing Solicitor
Notable Cases
-
Drugs/OCG cases
Nicola has acted as sole counsel on a number of complex and voluminous cases and is adept in understanding the evidential strands of Drugs Conspiracies and OCG cases including cell-site, ANPR, telemetry data, telephone traffic and more and has skilfully dealt with expert witnesses in such cases.
-
Operation Arctic. R v O and others. Conspiracy to supply Class A. Defending. 2023
Drugs/OCG cases
Trial pending. Multi-handed conspiracy to supply Class A drugs in Salford.
-
Operation Mitcham. R v C and others. Kidnap, False Imp, Blackmail. Defending. 2022
Drugs/OCG cases
Trial. Multi-handed OCG “turf war” where the victim was kidnapped and tortured in a “drugs house”. Trial ran for 8 weeks. Issues included voire dire hearsay arguments, PII, cell site and telephone data.
-
Operation Comanche. R v A and others. Undercover drugs operation. Defending. 2022.
Drugs/OCG cases
Trial. Represented 2 separate defendants in an undercover drugs operation. Issues involved flawed ID by an undercover officer and anonymity arguments.
-
Operation Horizon. R v M and others. County-lines drug trafficking. Defending. 2020.
Drugs/OCG cases
Trial. Drug-trafficking trial involving 33 defendants. “Operation Horizon” was prompted as a result of a nationwide county-lines drug dealing organising which had led to the deaths of 14 people in the Barrow area. Issues involved cell-site, digital data and ANPR.
-
Operation Stark. Prosecuting. July 2020
Drugs/OCG cases
Listed for trial twice due to covid-19 pandemic. In between those dates further offences came to light which prompted a guilty plea. Digital evidence was voluminous and required several days to review.
-
R v F. Prosecuting. Drug Smuggling. NCA case. Prosecuting
Drugs/OCG cases
Trial. Defendant attempted to smuggle over 120g of cocaine into Abu Dhabi where it would have held a street value of over £24,000. Jury sworn and case opened. Overnight, Nicola assisted the NCA in creating a sequence of events of the most incriminating phone messages. Thousands of pages of data to consider. Once served, the D was re-arraigned on day 2 of the trial and pleaded guilty.
-
R v A. Supply of importation quality cocaine and firearms. Prosecuting.
Drugs/OCG cases
Trial of issue. The Defendant pleaded guilty to possessing 3kilos of importation quality cocaine, with intent to supply it. He also pleaded guilty to possession of a prohibited weapon, namely a stun gun. He denied that he was significantly involved in the operation and claimed to be a warehouseman. After an effective trial of issue, the Judge ruled against him and sentenced him as per the Crown’s case. Case preparation involved analysing several thousand pages of phone data which revealed that in fact he was not working alone. His co-conspirators were subsequently arrested and prosecuted for conspiracy to supply drugs, and for possessing firearms. Cumulatively the gang were sentenced to more than 40 years in custody.
-
R v A and others. Conspiracy to Rob. Defending 2023
Serious Violence
Trial pending. Multi-handed prosecution relating to personal robberies in Manchester City Centre.
-
R v C. Controlling/Coercive behaviour and assault. Defending. September 2023
Serious Violence
Terminating ruling following successful legal argument on abuse of process.
-
R v F. S18 Wounding. Defending. September 2023.
Serious Violence
Stabbing of a stranger in Piccadilly Gardens. Listed for trial. Defendant had pleaded guilty to S20 at PTPH. Crown ultimately offered no evidence on the S18 after 2 trial dates had passed due to lack of court time. Defendant ultimately received a community order to reflect the time he had spent on a qualifying curfew.
-
R v R and others. Multi-handed Armed Robbery. Prosecuting. April 2023.
Serious Violence
Plea after 1st trial date. Organised armed robbery – victim lured to scene then ambushed. All 3 Defendants pleaded not guilty but changed their plea after the digital forensic analysis of the seized devices.
-
R v H. Serious Assault (S20). Prosecuting. February 2023
Serious Violence
Trial. Single count “one-punch” GBH on a football pitch resulting in a broken jaw with life-changing injuries. Defendant convicted. Legal argument on the admissibility of the victims good character.
-
Operation Valiant. R v M & others. Multi-handed Armed Robberies. Prosecuting. March 2023.
Serious Violence
Plea before trial. Multi handed armed robberies of students in Manchester. 10 count indictment.
-
R v B. Rape. Prosecuting. 2023
Rape and Serious Sexual Offences
Stranger attack. Intoxicated and vulnerable lone female preyed upon by D in Barrow town centre.
-
R v S. Sexual Assault by penetration. Prosecuting. 2023.
Rape and Serious Sexual Offences
Stranger attack. Intoxicated and vulnerable lone female preyed upon by D in Manchester City Centre.
-
R v F. Rape and Strangulation. Defending. September 2023
Rape and Serious Sexual Offences
Trial. Defendant acquitted after the prosecution offered no evidence on both offences following the cross-examination of the Complainant.
-
R v G. Rape of child under 13/multiple child sex offences. Prosecuting. January 2023
Rape and Serious Sexual Offences
Prosecution of a prolific paedophile. Voluminous and graphic digital forensic analysis.
-
R v M. Rape. Defending. November 2022.
Rape and Serious Sexual Offences
Trial. Defendant acquitted of the rape of a female he had met on a night out in Oldham.
-
R v A and others. Conspiracy to de-fraud. Defending. 2023.
Fraud/Other
Multi-handed “parcel fraud” conspiracy. Acting for a vulnerable female Defendant.
-
Operation Pelham. R v A and others. ICO prosecution. Defending. 2023
Fraud/Other
Multi-handed computer misuse case involving the use of unlawfully obtained data. Paper bundle over 2,000 pages. Acting for a man of good character.
-
R v M. £50,000 income tax fraud. Prosecuting. 2021
Fraud/Other
Plea before trial. 5 years of fraudulent tax returns. Paper heavy case requiring cross-referencing of all the various streams of evidence/data.
-
R v B. Fraud. Prosecuting. 2018
Fraud/Other
Trial. 10,000 page VAT fraud involving a female defendant who had a history of being a vexatious litigant. Instructed the day before trial. Defendant convicted.
-
R v C and K. Possession IIOC. Defending 2021.
Notable youth cases
Terminating ruling following successful legal argument on abuse of process where the “unconscionable” delay in prosecuting these youths was found to have “undermined the foundation stones of the youth justice system
-
R v A. Rape. Defending. 2019
Notable youth cases
Trial. Representing a 16 year old boy with both language and communication issues. He was assisted by an intermediary for the trial. Very sensitive stranger rape case involving frame by frame CCTV analysis from a number of city centre venues.
-
R v A. Rape. Defending. Youth Court
Notable youth cases
Trial. A 15 year old boy for trial had been charged with the rape of a 14 year old girl, arising out of what he argued was teenage sexual exploration. Issue was consent. The case involved sensitive and careful cross examination of a number of teenage witnesses and examination of phone evidence, some of which was not disclosed until day two of the trial. Defendant acquitted.
-
R v C. Rape. Prosecuting. Youth Court
Notable youth cases
Trial. Issue was consent. The Defendant, a 15 year old virgin, claimed that he reasonably believed that the Complainant was consenting. S41 application made and successfully opposed. Defendant convicted.
-
R v W Prosecuting. Rape. Youth Court
Notable youth cases
Trial. The Complainant was an adult relative of the youth Defendant. She was asleep at the time the offence was committed. Defendant convicted.
-
R v C Prosecuting. Biological weapons. Youth Court
Notable youth cases
Nicola was instructed by the CPS Complex Casework Unit in relation to a case being prosecuted under the Biological Weapons Act 1974. The defendant was a youth and had attempted to purchase abrin from the dark web. This was the 2nd only prosecution of its type in the UK. The case came down to legal arguments on the definition of the term “peaceful purpose”. Nicola successfully argued that the defendant did not have a defence of peaceful purpose pursuant to the Biological Weapons Act 1974. Guilty plea following successful legal argument.
Appointments
- Crown Prosecution Service Advocate Panel (Level 4)
- Crown Prosecution Service Rape and Serious Sexual Offences Panel
- Advocate
Education
- Staffordshire University - LLB (Hons)
- Former Solicitor - Admitted 2004
- Solicitor Advocate - 2009
- Called to the Bar - 2016 (Inner Temple
